If your problem is worth doing well, we should talk.
I design, build, and integrate bespoke AI systems — agentic, document-heavy, and operationally complex — that earn their place in production, not just the demo.
Four phases. Each one is a decision point, not a checkpoint.
A few engagements I’m permitted to describe.
I’ve built systems for regulated workplace-safety compliance that read, cross-check, and flag gaps across complex safety documentation — turning manual, error-prone review into fast, fully auditable checks.
I’ve built agentic retrieval systems and LLM knowledge bases that answer from your own documents with citations — including an adaptive AI tutor that responds to how each learner actually progresses.
I’ve built multi-agent architectures that coordinate perception, planning, and action across several independent systems working toward a shared objective.
I run a deliberately small practice. You work directly with me — the person who designs and builds your system — not an account manager, not a rotating bench. When an engagement needs specialised hands, I bring in trusted collaborators I’ve worked with for years. That is what “we” means here.
The first conversation is private and unbilled.
“The hardest part of enterprise AI is not the model. It is the quiet, careful work of making something a hundred people will trust on a Tuesday morning.”
What people ask.
The questions that usually decide whether a conversation is worth having.
Who are you?
What kind of problems are a good fit?
What experience do you bring?
How does a first engagement usually start?
Can you work with an existing team?
When is this not the right fit?
Bring me the problem worth doing well.
I take on a small number of engagements each quarter. The first conversation is private, unbilled, and focused on fit — not a demo, not free consulting.